First Lady Leads National Charge Against Food Waste with Türkiye and TIKA in Gunjur

By JarranewsTV Staff Reporter

In a strong demonstration of leadership and commitment to sustainable development, Her Excellency the First Lady, Fatoumatta Bah-Barrow, today stood at the forefront of The Gambia’s fight against food waste, joining forces with the Embassy of Türkiye and the Turkish Cooperation and Coordination Agency (TIKA) in Gunjur, West Coast Region, to commemorate the International Day of Zero Waste 2026.

The event, marked with purpose and urgency, reinforced The Gambia’s growing alignment with global efforts to confront one of the most pressing environmental challenges of our time. The International Day of Zero Waste, observed annually under the joint stewardship of UNEP and UN-Habitat, serves as a powerful reminder of the need for responsible consumption, efficient production systems, and sustainable waste management practices.

This year’s focus on food waste brings into sharp perspective a staggering global reality: nearly one billion tonnes of food are lost or wasted every year. Against this backdrop, the First Lady’s presence in Gunjur sent a clear and decisive message—The Gambia is not standing idle but is actively engaging international partners to drive meaningful change at the grassroots level

Central to the campaign is the promotion of the “5 R’s” principle—Refuse, Reduce, Reuse, Recycle, and Rot (compost)—a practical framework aimed at transforming everyday habits and fostering a culture of sustainability among citizens.

Today’s engagement in Gunjur was more than a symbolic observance; it was a call to action. Communities, institutions, and individuals alike are being urged to take ownership of the zero-waste agenda by adopting environmentally responsible behaviors, organizing awareness initiatives, and embracing innovative solutions to minimize waste.

With strong partnerships and visionary leadership, The Gambia continues to position itself as a proactive player in the global movement toward a circular economy—one that prioritizes resource efficiency, environmental protection, and long-term national resilience.

IEC Raises Red Flag Over Activities of Unregistered Political Groups

By JarranewsTV Staff Reporter

The Independent Electoral Commission (IEC) has issued a strong warning over what it describes as the increasing and unlawful involvement of unregistered political movements in the country’s electoral space, cautioning that such actions threaten the legal order governing democratic participation.

Speaking at the Commission’s second monthly Stakeholders Forum, IEC Chairman Joseph Colley expressed concern that a number of groups operating outside the bounds of the Elections Act 2025 are engaging in activities reserved exclusively for duly registered political parties.

“The emergence and conduct of some of these movements, which have not met the legal requirements to be recognised as political parties, is a matter of serious concern,” Colley stated. “The law is clear—only registered political parties are permitted to sponsor candidates, access state media under regulated conditions, and fully participate in the electoral process.”

The Commission warned that any entity found flouting these provisions risks facing legal consequences, including public sanctions, referral to the Attorney General’s Chambers, or court action.

While the IEC reaffirmed its commitment to ensuring an open and transparent voter registration process, it stressed that such integrity must be matched by strict adherence to the legal framework by all political actors.

Amid these concerns, the Commission continues to oversee the ongoing 2026 Supplementary Voter Registration exercise, which has drawn significant public participation since its launch on April 8. The exercise, set to conclude on May 21, caters to citizens who missed the 2021 registration, as well as those seeking transfers or replacement voter cards.

Chief Electoral Officer Sambujang Njie reported that over 41,000 applicants were registered in the first week alone, with women accounting for the majority of registrants. He also acknowledged minor operational challenges, including technical faults and isolated printing errors, noting that corrective measures have largely been implemented.

Although cases of attempted double registration have been recorded, the IEC emphasized that its primary concern remains the need to safeguard the electoral process from unlawful political activities that risk undermining public trust.

Colley concluded with a firm reminder that democracy must operate within the confines of the law, urging all political actors—both established and aspiring—to respect the rules that govern participation in The Gambia’s electoral system.

“From Condemnation to Complicity: The UDP’s Contradictions on Incendiary Speech”

By Alagi Yorro Jallow 

The paradoxes and contradictions of compromised media, self-proclaimed activists, human rights defenders, and the UDP.

The contradiction becomes even clearer when we recall that the United Democratic Party itself once condemned inflammatory rhetoric with admirable force. On June 25, 2025, as reported by The Alkamba Times, the UDP issued a blistering statement against Agriculture Minister Demba Sabally after he suggested that “shedding blood” might be necessary to secure President Barrow’s reelection. The party described Sabally’s remarks as reckless, irresponsible, and a direct assault on the nation’s democratic principles. They warned that such language risked inciting violence, undermining the integrity of the electoral process, and betraying the ministerial oath to serve all Gambians. Yet today, when similar if not more explicit rhetoric comes from their own senior official, Chairman Yankuba Darboe, the same moral urgency is nowhere to be found. This silence is not merely inconsistent; it exposes a troubling double standard in how political actors choose when to defend peace and when to look away.

Fatoumatta:The Gambia deserves a politics grounded in maturity, starting with the courage to say enough to bloodshed, insults, and tribal smears. Our democracy cannot survive if hypocrisy is normalized; it will only endure if every leader — whether NPP, UDP, minister, or lawyer — is held to the same standard of peace, dignity, and responsibility. So why the silence from the Gambia Bar Association, the National Human Rights Commission, and Baba Jalinding?

Reckless Posturing and a Misguided Narrative on The Gambia’s Electoral Integrity

By Yaya Dampha, NPP Diaspora Coordinator

Dr. Lamin Manneh’s latest public pronouncements regarding a so-called “software” to monitor and track election results are as troubling as they are intellectually shallow. They expose not innovation, but a dangerous blend of ignorance, political opportunism, and a willingness to mislead supporters on matters of national importance.

Let us address the facts—clearly, firmly, and without apology.

The Gambia’s Electoral System Is Manual, Transparent, and Tamper-Resistant

The Gambian voting system is neither electronic nor digitized. It is a simple, physical, and highly transparent marble voting process conducted in full public view. Votes are cast manually, counted manually, and verified manually—right at the polling stations.

There is no digital backend. No electronic transmission. No software-dependent infrastructure.

Therefore, Dr. Manneh must answer a very basic question:

What exactly is this “software” intended to monitor in a system that is entirely non-digital?

Anything presented beyond internal party record-keeping is, at best, redundant—and at worst, a deliberate attempt to manufacture doubt where none exists.

Counting Is Immediate, Open, and Verified by All Stakeholders

At the close of polls, counting begins instantly in the presence of:

Party agents from all contesting parties

Domestic and international observers

Security personnel

Ordinary citizens within the community

Each result is:

Publicly announced at the polling station

Officially recorded

Counter-signed by all party agents present

This is not a hidden process. It is one of the most transparent electoral mechanisms anywhere in the world.

Parallel Tabulation Is Not a License for Public Deception

Political parties are fully entitled to collect their own results through their agents. That is standard democratic practice.

However, let it be unequivocally stated:

No political party, no official, and certainly no self-styled technocrat has the legal authority to declare election results.

That authority rests solely with the Independent Electoral Commission (IEC).

Any attempt—direct or implied—to pre-empt, contradict, or publicly substitute the IEC’s mandate is reckless, unlawful, and a direct threat to public order.

Irresponsible Claims and Dangerous Implications

Dr. Manneh’s repeated assertions of “fraud,” unsupported by judicial validation, coupled with his party’s failure to substantiate such claims in court, raise serious concerns about credibility.

Even more alarming is the subtle conditioning of supporters to distrust official results in advance. This is not vigilance—it is calculated destabilization.

Political actors must understand that:

Democracy is governed by law, not by loud assertions

Electoral disputes are resolved in courts, not on radio talk shows

Public confidence must not be sacrificed for partisan theatrics

Security Institutions Must Remain Vigilant

Any narrative that encourages premature declaration of results or undermines legally established processes falls squarely within the domain of national security.

The security services have both the authority and the obligation to:

Prevent the spread of misinformation capable of inciting unrest

Ensure compliance with electoral laws

Safeguard peace and stability before, during, and after elections

This responsibility must be exercised firmly and without hesitation.

Conclusion: Leadership Demands Responsibility, Not Noise

The Gambian people deserve seriousness, honesty, and respect for institutions—not technological grandstanding or political narcissism disguised as innovation.

Dr. Manneh’s statements do not strengthen democracy; they weaken it. They do not inform the public; they risk inflaming it.

The path to State House is not paved through confusion, intimidation, or self-declared victories. It is earned through lawful participation, credible evidence, and respect for the sovereign will of the people as declared by the IEC.

Anything short of that is not politics—it is recklessness.

Editorial: When Silence Becomes Complicity: Selective Outrage and Dangerous Rhetoric in The Gambia

By JarranewsTV Editorial Board

There is a troubling inconsistency creeping into The Gambia’s public discourse—one that threatens not only fairness, but the very principles of accountability and peace that our democracy depends on.

When Demba Sabally  stated that NPP  supporters were “ready to shed their blood” to ensure the re-election of President AdamaBarrow, the backlash was immediate and intense. Opposition parties, civil society actors, and self-styled activists rushed to condemn the remark. In many instances, the statement was stretched beyond its ordinary meaning—mischaracterized as a call to violence against others, rather than what it more commonly signifies: a willingness to sacrifice oneself for a political cause.

Yet, in stark contrast, when the Chairman of Brikama area council  publicly asserted that “for a peaceful change of government to happen, somebody has to die,” the response has been muted, if not entirely absent. This was not metaphorical. It was not symbolic. It was a deeply troubling assertion that introduces the idea of death as a condition for political transition—an idea that strikes at the very core of democratic order.

The silence from key institutions has been deafening.

Where is the principled response from the National Human Rights Commission? Where are the strong, unequivocal statements from civil society organizations that claim to defend human rights and democratic norms? Why has there been no decisive repudiation from the United Democratic Party, a party that prides itself on legal expertise and intellectual leadership?

This selective outrage erodes public trust. It sends a dangerous message that accountability is guided not by principle, but by political convenience. When one statement is amplified and condemned—arguably beyond its intended meaning—while another, far more explicit in its dangerous implication, is ignored, it exposes a double standard that weakens the credibility of those who claim moral authority.

The Gambia’s democratic journey has been shaped by hard-earned lessons about the cost of instability and the value of peace. That progress must not be undermined by reckless rhetoric or by the failure to confront it when it arises. Words carry weight—especially in politically sensitive moments—and leaders must be held to the highest standard of responsibility.

We therefore call not only on national institutions, civil society, and political actors to break their silence, but also urge the international community and global human rights organizations to take note. Statements that suggest violence as a pathway to political change are not mere domestic concerns—they are warning signs that demand vigilance, scrutiny, and principled response.

The Gambia cannot afford a culture where dangerous words are either distorted for expediency or ignored for convenience. Consistency is the foundation of justice, and without it, advocacy becomes hollow.

Silence, in moments like this, is not neutrality—it is complicity.

https://www.amnesty.org/en/

https://www.hrw.org/

https://www.ecowas.int/

https://www.gov.uk/world/organisations/british-high-commission-banjul

https://gm.usembassy.gov/

HON. DAWDA A. JALLOW, ADDRESSES PBC MEETING ON THE GAMBIA AT UN HEADQUARTERS, NEW YORK CITY

At a defining moment in its democratic rebirth, The Gambia steps confidently onto the global stage—not as a nation burdened by its past, but as a beacon of resilience, reform, and unwavering political will. Under the visionary leadership of President Adama Barrow, the country’s transition from the shadows of former ruler to a thriving democratic order stands today as a compelling testament to what determined governance and international partnership can achieve.

This address to the is not merely a diplomatic engagement—it is a powerful declaration of progress, accountability, and national resolve. It boldly affirms The Gambia’s commitment to justice, reconciliation, and sustainable peace, while calling on the world to recognize and reinforce a success story that continues to inspire beyond its borders.

On behalf of His Excellency President Adama Barrow, the Government of The Gambia extends its sincere gratitude to all members of the Peacebuilding Commission for your continued political attention and solidarity with The Gambia's peacebuilding journey. 

The Peacebuilding Commission has been, and remains, an indispensable partner, providing political accompaniment, mobilizing resources, and promoting coherence across the UN system in support of our nationally owned process. 

Your sustained engagement with us in The Gambia sends an important signal of international solidarity with not only member states, but equally, victims and survivors of gross human rights violations, and civil society, all over the world.

Nine years have passed since the end of Former President Yahya Jammeh's 22-year authoritarian rule in The Gambia. In that time, we have been on a remarkable democratic transition. We have witnessed two cycles of peaceful presidential, legislative and local government elections, built new institutions, enacted landmark legislation, and demonstrated that transitional justice can serve as a strong, and genuine foundation for sustainable peace. 

A close and natural partnership has emerged between the Government of The Gambia, our UN Country Team and the Peacebuilding and Peace Support Office (PBPSO) since the onset of our transition in 2017. 

In 2025, this culminated in the selection of The Gambia as the first member state to undergo the Peacebuilding Impact Spotlight exercise through the Peacebuilding Impact Hub. 

For almost 12 months, we have undertaken a thorough and participatory research initiative into what transitional justice has achieved and where it still needs to deliver for the people of The Gambia.  

It has been an intense exercise, but equally an exhilarating and motivating year full of reflections, discussions and consultations.

As Minister of Justice and policy leader on transitional justice in The Gambia, today is an important opportunity to reflect honestly on what has been achieved, what remains, and where international support is most urgently needed for The Gambia. 

Following the conclusion of the research component of the Spotlight exercise, I am grateful for this opportunity to present to you too, Your Excellencies, an outline of a national strategy for transitional justice.

HIGHLIGHTING KEY ACHIEVEMENTS: WHAT WE HAVE DELIVERED

Your Excellencies, 

The Truth, Reconciliation and Reparations Commission, established in December 2017 by the Government of The Gambia, created an unprecedented national space for victims, survivors, and perpetrators to speak publicly for the first time about gross human rights violations committed on our country between July 1994 and January 2017. The testimonies and stories broadcasted over live television for almost 3 years gripped our nation. These were difficult times, but necessary. By making truth-seeking a national conversation, this Commission, the TRRC, dismantled denialism and placed The Gambia in a unique historical position to mend our social fabric and contract between people and Government, whilst reaffirming human dignity as the foundation for sustainable peace. 

Following the submission of its Report and recommendations, The Government of The Gambia has consistently demonstrated the highest level of will to drive the implementation of the TRRC’s recommendations to their logical conclusion. 

We have accepted to implement 263 of the 265 recommendations made by the Commission, even publishing an Implementation Plan on how this will be achieved: over a 5-year period (January 2023 to December 2027), involving 304 activities, 59 national institutions and a cost estimate of 150 million USD.

Your Excellencies, 

One needs not look much further than The Gambia for powerful demonstration of sustained political will almost a decade into our democratic transition. Our processes have always been driven by our people, victims and survivors foremost, and responded to by the Government and our National Assembly. Since 2017, The Gambia has introduced robust legislative and institutional frameworks across all pillars of transitional justice:

On the reparations track: The Victims Reparations Act, enacted in 2023, establishes both the Victims Reparations Commission and the Victims Reparations Fund, and essentially takes over from the TRRC’s interim mandate to administer reparations. In 2025 and 2026, the Government of The Gambia allocated 20 million GMD in each year for the Fund, which we are proud to see being administered by the Commission in accordance with its compensation policy. The administration of reparations for victims, survivors and communities of gross human rights violation in The Gambia, is a critical component and milestone of our transitional justice process, one His Excellency, President Adama Barrow often describes as a “super priority.”

On the accountability track: The National Assembly passed the Ban from Public Office (TRRC) Act (November 2023), the Special Accountability Mechanism Act (April 2024), the Special Prosecutor's Office Act (April 2024), and in partnership with ECOWAS, a hybrid tribunal, the Special Tribunal for The Gambia was also created (December 2024). We are proud to present to the world under this framework, a unique post-conflict, justice and criminal accountability mechanism that activates pathways for both domestic and international prosecutions, with a strong focus on judicial expediency, victim’s participation, and witness protection, whilst strengthening national justice and security sector institutions.

On guarantees of non-recurrence: The National Human Rights Commission is fully operational as an “A status,” independent national human rights institution. In more recent times, a National Strategy on Memorialization, and a National Programme on Archiving have also been developed through a consultative approach, and soon to be reviewed by Cabinet.  

All of these formal mechanisms have also been complemented by consistent community dialogues amongst traditional, religious, women and youth-led networks. The Spotlight exercise, and its final Report confirms that this “people centered,” complementarity approach to legislative and institutional building is essential to sustaining peace. 

REMAINING CHALLENGES: AN HONEST ASSESSMENT

The Government of The Gambia is committed to transparency. The Spotlight research confirms what we acknowledge: public confidence declines when implementation slows or is not clearly communicated. 

According to the National Human Rights Commission, mandated to monitor and report on the implementation of the TRRC recommendations, the Government of The Gambia has 3 years into the implementation phase, fully implemented 48 out of 263 recommendations, commenced implementation of another 133 recommendations, and yet to commence implementing 92 recommendations.  

We are committed to accelerating this pace and improving communication with victims, their communities, and indeed, all Gambians. This is not a process we are prepared to allow to stall.

However, a daunting reality must be confronted by the Government, and all supporters of our process. 

The cost estimates to implement the recommendations of the TRRC is approximately 150 million USD, of which significant portions remain unfunded. 

To give this Peacebuilding Commission a concrete sense of what is at stake: the operationalization of the hybrid Special Tribunal alone is estimated to require approximately 60 million USD over five years, or roughly 12 million USD per year. Investigations, and domestic prosecutions through the Special Prosecutor’s Office and the Special Criminal Division of our High Court are estimated to require approximately 2.5 million USD per year. The Victims Reparations Commission requires sustained deposits into the Reparations Fund; the Government has to date, allocated 40 million GMD towards the Fund, and another 20 million GMD for the operations of the Reparations Commission, but the scale of need across victim categories is considerably larger, and indicative figures for full delivery are still being costed as the Commission builds its national victims database. 

Community reconciliation programming and civil society engagement represent a further set of needs that, while individually more modest, are essential to the process’s credibility at the local level. The significant reduction of donor funded governance project, and development financing in general, has created real pressure across all of these tracks. 

In response, the Government of The Gambia is actively looking inwards, and seeking to diversify our partnerships to build on the essential, and promising foundations for sustainable peace thanks to the UN Peacebuilding Funds. 

THE NATIONAL STRATEGY: EMERGING PRIORITIES FOR THE NEXT PHASE

Your Excellencies, 

The Government of The Gambia, with technical assistance from the UN Resident Coordinator’s Office is in the process of developing a comprehensive national strategic document on transitional justice, one that consolidates lessons from the Spotlight Report, and 3 years of implementation of the TRRC recommendations. 

We are committed to getting this document right rather than getting it done quickly, but I would like to present an outline of the strategy's emerging framework and key priorities.

The draft National Strategy for Transitional Justice and Peacebuilding in The Gambia responds to a decisive moment in our process. It does not introduce new commitments; it consolidates those already adopted through the Government White Paper and Implementation Plan on the TRRC recommendations, and provides a shared reference to guide delivery during the period 2026–2027. 

Its central purpose is to move The Gambia from a phase defined by frameworks and commitments to one defined by consistent, credible, and visible results. 

The strategy is structured around four interrelated orientations: consolidating existing gains; advancing accountability toward visible delivery; reinforcing guarantees of non-recurrence; and supporting reconciliation in a sequenced manner. 

It clarifies roles across institutions, prioritizes coordination and public communication, and identifies targeted areas for financing and partnership. The strategy acknowledges candidly that the principal challenge today is not the definition of commitments, but their translation into outcomes that victims and communities, and all Gambians can see and feel.

The emerging strategic priorities for the next phase are: (1) operationalizing the Special Prosecutor's Office and the hybrid Special Tribunal; (2) accelerating the reparations programme, including through the Reparations Fund; (3) deepening reconciliation at the community level; (4) advancing security sector reform; and (5) finalizing outstanding legislative reforms. These priorities build on existing national frameworks and reflect the evidence generated by the Spotlight research.

OUR ASK OF THE COMMISSION

Sustained Political Attention and Advocacy

Your Excellencies, 

The Gambia asks the Peacebuilding Commission to continue its political accompaniment. This includes advocating with bilateral partners and international financial institutions for sustained, flexible, and predictable support for The Gambia's transitional justice process. Political attention from this body sends an important signal of solidarity to our victims, our civil society, and our people, and we do not take it for granted.

Financial Support for the Special Tribunal and Reparations

We appeal to member states and partners to consider concrete financial and technical contributions — particularly for the operationalization of the hybrid Special Tribunal and the reparations programme. ECOWAS has provided its political and institutional endorsement for prosecutions. What is now required is funding. The architecture exists; what must follow are resources to operationalize this ambitious- but carefully designed, post-conflict criminal accountability mechanism.

The Gambia as a Model for South-South and Triangular Learning

The Gambia stands ready to share its experience — the lessons of truth-seeking, the importance of institutional anchors, the vital leadership role of victim, women and youth led civil society organizations, and around community-level reconciliation — with countries navigating similar transitions. The Peacebuilding Commission can play a critical bridging role in facilitating that exchange, and we welcome that partnership.

CLOSING: RESOLVE, NATIONAL OWNERSHIP, AND PARTNERSHIP

To conclude, Your Excellencies,

The Gambia's transitional justice process is nationally owned, evidence-based, and irreversible. The Jammeh era is part of our history — but it will not define our future. We have held consultations with our people, built institutions, passed laws, and conducted research into what has worked well, and what can be improved. We are in the process of learning from our own doings, both lessons and best practices, whilst responding to shifts in global political and financial and economic dynamics, with sharper focus of what has always been our objective: the reconstruction of our nation rooted in respect for human rights, the rule of law, human dignity and sustainable peace.

What we now ask is that the international community match our commitment with sustained, reliable support. Since 2017, and despite a long list of multifaceted challenges, The Gambia has demonstrated that where there is political will, there is a way. We remain resolute. We remain committed. And we remain grateful for the solidarity of this Commission.

Continue to stand with The Gambia.

I thank you for your kind attention.

Editorial l: WHEN DIALOGUE PREVAILS: A PATH TO RESPONSIBLE MEDIA REGULATION IN THE GAMBIA

In a moment that could easily have deepened divisions within The Gambia’s media landscape, the Gambia Press Union (GPU) and key stakeholders have instead chosen a path that deserves recognition: dialogue over confrontation. Their recent engagement with media associations, civil society, and legal actors on the proposed 2026 media regulations signals a level of institutional maturity that is both timely and necessary.

At the heart of this development lies a fundamental democratic principle—regulation must be guided by consultation, not imposition. History has shown that when media policies are introduced without broad engagement, they are often met with resistance and mistrust. Conversely, when they are shaped through inclusive dialogue, they gain legitimacy and foster collective ownership.

The proposed Broadcasting and Online Content Regulations 2026, along with accompanying licensing and journalist registration guidelines, represent a significant shift in the governance of the Gambian media sector. These frameworks will inevitably influence how information is produced, distributed, and consumed. As such, they must strike a delicate balance between safeguarding press freedom and ensuring professional accountability.

The GPU’s decision to engage constructively in this process is commendable. Rather than framing the regulations as a witch hunt, the Union has demonstrated leadership by opting for dialogue and consensus-building. At the same time, it is equally important that the Ministry of Information exercises restraint and responsibility. Regulation must not be weaponized against journalists, as doing so would undermine the very democratic values it seeks to uphold.

However, beyond the regulatory debate lies a deeper structural challenge that the media fraternity must confront: the question of identity and standards within the profession.

In today’s digital era, the lines between journalists, content creators, activists, and entertainers have become increasingly blurred. While each of these actors plays a role in public discourse, they are not interchangeable. Journalism remains a distinct profession grounded in ethics, verification, and accountability.

The failure to clearly distinguish between these roles has contributed to a media environment that is, at times, toxic, immature, and potentially dangerous. When individuals without adherence to journalistic standards claim the title of journalist—and when such claims go unchallenged—it erodes public trust and weakens the integrity of the profession.

It is therefore incumbent upon the GPU and media institutions to draw a firm and principled line. Defining who qualifies as a journalist should not be seen as exclusionary, but rather as essential to preserving the credibility and dignity of the craft.

Equally concerning is the growing influence of politically motivated actors within the media space. Media practitioners must remain vigilant against the encroachment of partisan interests—whether from activists with political agendas or from direct political interference. The independence of the newsroom is non-negotiable; once compromised, the public’s access to truth is equally endangered.

Furthermore, there is an urgent need to reassess content priorities within the Gambian media. An overemphasis on political discourse, often at the expense of other critical areas, limits the sector’s contribution to national development. While politics is undeniably important, it must not dominate the entire media agenda.

Greater attention should be given to issues such as entrepreneurship, youth development, education, and innovation. Media platforms must serve not only as spaces for debate but also as tools for empowerment—informing citizens, particularly young people, about opportunities for growth and the pathways to progress.

The recent consensus to involve the Gambia Bar Association as a neutral convener in the next phase of discussions is a positive step. It reinforces the commitment to fairness, legal clarity, and inclusivity in shaping the final regulatory framework.

The road ahead will undoubtedly present challenges. Differences in opinion are inevitable in any democratic process. Yet, what matters most is the willingness of all parties to remain engaged, principled, and focused on the broader national interest.

The events of this past engagement offer a crucial lesson: meaningful progress is achieved not through polarization, but through patience, dialogue, and shared responsibility.

As The Gambia navigates this critical juncture in its media evolution, all stakeholders must rise to the occasion. The GPU must continue to lead with balance and foresight. The government must regulate with fairness and restraint. And media practitioners must uphold the highest standards of professionalism and independence.

Only then can the country build a media landscape that is free, responsible, and truly reflective of the democratic aspirations of its people.

In the end, the strength of a nation’s media is not measured solely by its freedom, but by how responsibly that freedom is exercised.

GAMBIA’S REMARKABLE TRANSFORMATION DRAWS INTERNATIONAL PRAISE

By Yaya Dampha, NPP Diaspora Coordinator

The New Gambia continues to earn admiration on the global stage, as yet another international voice has testified to the country’s undeniable progress under the leadership of Adama Barrow. A visiting Rwandan journalist attending a major international media forum in Banjul expressed genuine astonishment at the scale and pace of infrastructural development across the country—particularly when compared to his last visit a decade ago.

From modern road networks to expanding urban skylines and improved public facilities, The Gambia is undergoing a visible transformation that reflects a government committed to national development and prosperity. The expanding Bertil Harding Highway, the ongoing OIC-funded road projects, and the steady electrification of rural communities stand as concrete proof of a country on the move.

Predictably, as with any progress story, detractors have attempted to downplay these achievements on social media. However, such reactions often expose a troubling mix of misinformation, selective memory, and, at times, outright denial of reality. The truth remains clear: development is not a matter of opinion—it is visible, measurable, and widely acknowledged by both citizens and international observers.

Equally significant is the peaceful democratic environment that now defines The Gambia. The ability of citizens to freely express dissent—even through public demonstrations—is itself a landmark achievement. Under the previous regime of Yahya Jammeh, such freedoms were brutally suppressed. The tragic events of April 2000, where student protesters were gunned down, and the 2016 arrest and death in custody of activist Solo Sandeng, remain painful reminders of a repressive past.

Today, those dark chapters have given way to a new era of tolerance, rule of law, and respect for human rights. Political leaders such as Ousainou Darboe—once imprisoned for demanding justice—now operate freely within a democratic system that guarantees political pluralism and civil liberties.

Moreover, The Gambia’s peace is not merely anecdotal—it is reflected in its growing reputation as one of the most stable countries in the subregion. The return of exiled citizens, the flourishing tourism sector, and continued partnerships with international development organizations all point to a nation that is both secure and forward-looking.

Economic indicators further reinforce this narrative. Increased investments in agriculture, digital infrastructure, and youth empowerment programs are creating opportunities and restoring hope. The expansion of electricity access through projects like the OMVG initiative is connecting communities and powering local economies like never before.

In essence, The Gambia today stands as a compelling example of what political will, democratic governance, and national unity can achieve. While no nation is without challenges, the trajectory is unmistakably positive.

The testimony of the visiting Rwandan journalist is not an isolated opinion—it is a reflection of a broader reality. The Gambia is rising, peacefully and steadily, and the world is taking notice.

THE GAMBIA STANDS TALL: GOVERNMENT REAFFIRMS IRREVERSIBLE PATH TO JUSTICE AND LASTING PEACE

By JarranewsTV Staff Reporter

At the prestigious halls of the United Nations Headquarters in New York, Honourable Attorney General and Minister of Justice, Dawda A. Jallow, delivered a resounding and confidence-filled address that reaffirmed The Gambia’s unwavering commitment to justice, accountability, and sustainable peace.

Speaking before the Peacebuilding Commission (PBC), the Justice Minister conveyed the strong appreciation of President Adama Barrow’s government for the continued global support that has accompanied The Gambia’s remarkable democratic transition since the end of authoritarian rule nearly a decade ago.

The statement highlighted The Gambia as a shining example of how political will, people-centered governance, and international partnership can transform a nation once gripped by repression into a beacon of democratic progress.

A TRANSITION ROOTED IN THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE

Hon. Jallow underscored that since 2017, The Gambia has undergone an extraordinary transformation marked by peaceful elections, strong institutional reforms, and groundbreaking legislation. Central to this progress has been the Truth, Reconciliation and Reparations Commission (TRRC), which courageously brought to light the truth about past human rights violations.

The government, he emphasized, has demonstrated unmatched political resolve by accepting nearly all recommendations of the TRRC and launching a comprehensive implementation plan spanning five years, involving dozens of institutions and hundreds of activities.

“This is not just a commitment on paper—it is a living, breathing national mission,” the Minister asserted.

DELIVERING JUSTICE: FROM PROMISES TO ACTION

In a bold demonstration of action over rhetoric, the government has already established key legal and institutional frameworks to deliver justice and reparations.

Among the landmark achievements is the creation of the Victims Reparations Commission and Fund, backed by consistent government funding. President Barrow has elevated reparations to a “super priority,” ensuring that victims and survivors receive the recognition and support they deserve.

On accountability, The Gambia has broken new ground with the establishment of a hybrid Special Tribunal in partnership with ECOWAS, alongside the Special Prosecutor’s Office and critical legislation to bar perpetrators from public office. These measures position The Gambia as a global model for post-conflict justice.

HONEST ABOUT CHALLENGES, DETERMINED TO SUCCEED

While celebrating significant progress, Hon. Jallow maintained a tone of transparency, acknowledging that challenges remain—particularly in funding and the pace of implementation.

Out of 263 recommendations, dozens have already been fully implemented, with many more in progress. The government, however, is not resting on its laurels.

“We will not allow this process to stall,” he declared firmly, signaling renewed urgency in accelerating delivery and strengthening communication with the Gambian people.

A major hurdle remains the financial cost of fully implementing the transitional justice agenda, estimated at $150 million. Yet, even in the face of global economic pressures and declining donor support, the government is actively mobilizing resources and forging new partnerships.

A CLEAR STRATEGY FOR THE FUTURE

Looking ahead, the government is finalizing a comprehensive National Strategy for Transitional Justice and Peacebuilding for 2026–2027. This strategy aims to shift the country from planning to tangible, visible results that every Gambian can see and feel.

Key priorities include operationalizing the Special Tribunal, accelerating reparations, deepening community reconciliation, advancing security sector reforms, and completing outstanding legislation.

This strategic clarity reinforces The Gambia’s determination not only to complete the transition but to set a global standard.

A CALL FOR GLOBAL SOLIDARITY

In a passionate appeal, Hon. Jallow called on the international community to match The Gambia’s commitment with sustained political and financial support—particularly for the Special Tribunal and reparations programs.

“The architecture is in place. What we need now are the resources to deliver justice,” he emphasized.

He further positioned The Gambia as a model for other nations navigating similar transitions, ready to share its experiences in truth-seeking, reconciliation, and institutional reform.

AN IRREVERSIBLE JOURNEY FORWARD

Closing his address, the Justice Minister delivered a powerful message of resolve: The Gambia’s journey toward justice and peace is irreversible.

With strong leadership, a resilient population, and growing international recognition, the country continues to move forward—determined to ensure that the painful chapters of its past will never define its future.

“The Gambia has shown that where there is political will, there is always a way,” Hon. Jallow concluded.

And as the world watches, The Gambia stands firm—committed, determined, and unshakably on the path to justice.

Watct out for the full text of the Minister’s speech 

Editorial: DEFENDING TRUTH IN A SEASON OF NOISE: A NATION AT THE CROSSROADS

It is a well-known Mandinka adage that a truth spoken at a Bantaba in Jarra Jappineh remains the same truth at Gunjur Kabefo. In that spirit, Jarranews stands firm in full agreement with brother Alagi Yorro Jallow.

Alagi Yorro Jallow’s reflection is not merely an opinion piece—it is a necessary intervention in a national conversation that is fast losing its moral anchor. At a time when The Gambia should be consolidating its democratic gains, his warning cuts through the clutter with clarity and urgency: the danger we face today is no longer overt tyranny, but the quiet corrosion of truth, responsibility, and civic integrity.

More than two decades ago, Lamin Waa Juwara alias Mbarodi issued a statement that has since matured into prophecy. His observation was never an insult to the Gambian people; it was a challenge to their conscience. Today, that challenge remains unmet. The tragedy is not that voices have multiplied in the democratic space—it is that too many of those voices are empty, self-serving, and unaccountable.

Jallow correctly identifies a troubling phenomenon: the rise of individuals who have mastered visibility without substance. They dominate public discourse not through depth of ideas or credibility of record, but through volume, repetition, and calculated outrage. This is not democracy in action; it is democracy reduced to performance.

The invocation of Noam Chomsky’s concept of “manufacturing consent” is particularly apt. What we are witnessing in The Gambia today is a localized adaptation of that theory—where public perception is shaped not by evidence, but by emotional manipulation, selective narratives, and deliberate distortion. In such an environment, truth becomes negotiable, and falsehood gains legitimacy through repetition.

Equally powerful is the moral lens borrowed from Chinua Achebe. Achebe’s reminder about humility speaks directly to a generation that inherited freedom but now risks squandering it. Democracy was not handed down as a tool for personal branding or political theatrics; it was earned through sacrifice, courage, and resistance. To weaponize it for self-promotion is to betray its very foundation. We must always remember that the democracy that is being misused lives, and years of traumatic exile in foreign lands.

Mbading your argument goes beyond individual grievances. It speaks to a systemic erosion of national memory—a condition far more dangerous than any single act of misinformation. When history is distorted and facts are casually rewritten, a nation loses its compass. Without a shared understanding of truth, accountability becomes impossible, and democracy begins to drift.

The legal context he highlights, including the implications of Gambia Press Union v. Attorney General, underscores the delicate balance between freedom of expression and responsibility. Rights without accountability create fertile ground for abuse. Freedom of speech must not become freedom to mislead.

What makes Jallow’s reflection especially compelling is its refusal to romanticize the present. It does not pretend that all criticism is harmful or that dissent is the problem. On the contrary, robust debate is the lifeblood of democracy. But debate must be anchored in truth, guided by integrity, and driven by the public good—not personal ambition.

The Gambia today stands at a crossroads. One path leads to a mature democracy grounded in accountability, truth, and institutional strength. The other leads to a hollow republic, where noise replaces knowledge, and perception overrides reality. The choice is not abstract—it is being made daily in our media, our politics, and our civic engagement.

Jallow’s message is therefore both a warning and a call to action. Defending truth is no longer optional; it is a civic duty. Silence in the face of distortion is complicity. Indifference to misinformation is surrender.

The republic deserves better than noise masquerading as patriotism. It deserves citizens who understand that democracy is not a stage, but a responsibility. And above all, it deserves defenders of truth—steadfast, principled, and unafraid.

GAMBIA–NIGERIA PARTNERSHIP STRENGTHENS AS AMBASSADOR YABOU HOSTS HIGH-LEVEL SECURITY DELEGATION

By JarranewsTV Staff Reporter

BANJUL, 20 April 2026 — In a powerful demonstration of The Gambia’s growing diplomatic influence and commitment to regional stability, the Permanent Secretary and Head of the Diplomatic Service, Ambassador Lang Yabou, proudly received a distinguished high-level delegation from Nigeria at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, International Cooperation and Gambians Abroad.

The delegation, comprising 54 members from the prestigious Nigerian Army Resource Center (NARC), arrived in The Gambia as part of an elite Leadership and Strategic Studies Course study tour themed “Defeating Emerging Asymmetric Threats: The Need for Regional Cooperation.” Their choice of The Gambia as a key destination underscores the country’s rising reputation as a hub for peacebuilding, strategic dialogue, and regional collaboration.

Welcoming the delegation on behalf of the Honourable Minister of Foreign Affairs, H.E. Sering Modou Njie, Ambassador Yabou described The Gambia as their “second home,” highlighting the deep-rooted brotherhood and unshakable diplomatic ties between Banjul and Abuja. He commended Nigeria’s continued role as a pillar of strength in Africa and expressed profound appreciation for its unwavering support to The Gambia’s development and security sectors.

In a compelling and visionary address, Ambassador Yabou paid glowing tribute to the brave men and women in uniform across West Africa, whose sacrifices continue to safeguard peace and stability. He emphasized that The Gambia remains deeply grateful for Nigeria’s longstanding investment in training Gambian security personnel—an effort that has significantly enhanced national capacity and professionalism.

With clarity and conviction, Ambassador Yabou stressed that the evolving nature of global security threats demands unity, vigilance, and bold collective action. He noted that asymmetric threats—ranging from terrorism to transnational crime—can only be defeated through strengthened regional cooperation, intelligence sharing, and sustained capacity building within the ECOWAS sub-region.

“The challenges we face today require not isolated responses, but a united front,” Ambassador Yabou declared, reaffirming The Gambia’s leadership role in championing regional peace initiatives. He further highlighted that lasting security must go hand in hand with addressing root causes such as poverty, youth unemployment, climate change, and limited access to education.

The visit of the Nigerian delegation stands as a testament to The Gambia’s growing strategic importance and its unwavering commitment to fostering peace, stability, and development across Africa. It also reinforces the country’s proactive foreign policy under the current administration—one that prioritizes partnership, solidarity, and sustainable progress.

Ambassador Yabou concluded with a firm and inspiring message: The Gambia remains resolute in its mission to promote peace and security, not only within its borders but across the entire region and beyond. Through strengthened alliances—especially with key partners like Nigeria—the country continues to position itself at the forefront of Africa’s collective fight against emerging threats.

This landmark engagement marks yet another milestone in The Gambia’s diplomatic success story, as it continues to rise as a beacon of cooperation, resilience, and forward-looking leadership in West Africa.

Dr. Ismaila Ceesay Champions Digital Safety Agenda to Protect Young Minds

The Honourable Minister for Information, Media and Broadcasting Services, Dr. Ismaila Ceesay, has reaffirmed government’s unwavering commitment to safeguarding young people in the digital space, as he engaged directly with youth on the Young People in the Media (YPM) radio talk show aired on Taxi FM.

The interactive programme, which focused on the timely and critical theme of “Digital Safety of Young People,” highlighted the growing need to shield the younger generation from the dangers of an increasingly complex online environment. From misinformation and cyberbullying to data privacy risks, the discussion underscored how vulnerable young users can be without proper guidance and protection.

Minister Ceesay used the platform to strongly advocate for responsible digital behavior, stressing that the theme is not just a topic for discussion but a national priority. He emphasized that empowering young people with the right knowledge and tools will serve as a protective shield against harmful online influences, manipulation, and exploitation.

According to the Minister, promoting digital safety is essential in nurturing a generation that is both informed and resilient. He noted that strengthening media literacy among youths will enable them to critically assess information, avoid falling prey to fake news, and engage responsibly in public discourse. This, he said, is key to building a more enlightened and progressive society.

The theme also resonates deeply with the government’s broader vision of creating a safe digital ecosystem where young people can thrive, innovate, and express themselves without fear. By equipping them with critical thinking skills and awareness of online risks, the initiative serves as a proactive measure to protect their future and well-being.

Listeners actively participated in the discussion, raising pressing concerns about online privacy, misinformation, and ethical media use—further demonstrating the relevance and urgency of the theme. The Minister welcomed these contributions, describing them as evidence of a growing, conscious, and engaged youth population.

The Ministry of Information, Media and Broadcasting Services continues to lead from the front in advancing youth-centered initiatives, reaffirming its strong support for platforms like YPM that amplify young voices while promoting responsible media engagement.

This latest engagement by Minister Ceesay stands as a clear testament to the government’s dedication to protecting young people and preparing them to navigate the digital world safely, confidently, and responsibly.

Ministry of Health Warns Against Fraudulent Birth Certificates

 

By JarranewsTV Staff Reporter

The Ministry of Health has announced the discontinuation of the issuance of old, elongated birth certificates, citing concerns over the increasing production and circulation of fraudulent versions.

In a press release, the Ministry informed the public that it has fully digitized the birth registration process. All birth certificates are now issued in a newly designed A4 format, featuring the national emblem, the Gambian flag, and a QR code to enhance authenticity and security.

Authorities revealed that the decision to phase out the old certificates took effect on 28 February 2023, following the nationwide rollout of the digital birth registration system.

The Ministry expressed concern over reports that counterfeit versions of the outdated certificates are being illegally produced and distributed. As a result, it warned that anyone found in possession of fake certificates or involved in issuing the obsolete documents will face serious legal consequences.

According to the Ministry, such offences constitute a felony under Section 7 of the Births, Deaths, Marriages and Divorce Act of 1990. The law criminalizes the destruction, alteration, or falsification of official registry documents, as well as the creation or use of counterfeit certified copies.

The public is therefore urged to comply with the new system and ensure that all official documentation is obtained through legitimate and authorized channels.

PROOF OVER PROPAGANDA: Yaya Dampha Calls Out Lamin Manneh’s Baseless Electoral Fraud Claims

By Yaya Dampha, NPP Diaspora Coordinator

It is becoming increasingly difficult to take Mr. Lamin Manneh seriously when he repeatedly chooses sensationalism over substance. For someone who prides himself on intellectualism, his recent claims regarding voter registration fraud fall far below the standards expected of responsible national discourse. The Gambian people deserve facts—not recycled propaganda framed as concern.

Mr. Manneh is fully aware, or ought to be, that The Gambia’s electoral system is governed by clear legal frameworks designed to ensure transparency and accountability. The voter registration process is not conducted in secrecy, nor is it monopolized by any single political party. On the contrary, all political parties—including the UDP—are legally entitled to deploy agents at every registration centre. These agents are mandated to observe, record, and report any suspected irregularities.

If indeed there are instances of underage individuals or non-Gambians being registered, the law provides a clear and credible path: gather verifiable evidence and present it before the revising courts. That is how serious allegations are handled in a democracy. The burden of proof lies with the accuser—not with the public, and certainly not with those being accused without evidence.

What is deeply concerning is the persistence of a familiar pattern. For over three decades, the UDP has participated in electoral processes, yet the narrative remains unchanged—whenever outcomes are unfavourable, allegations of fraud and unfairness quickly follow. At some point, a political movement must rise above perpetual grievance and embrace democratic maturity: winning with humility and accepting defeat with dignity.

The attempt to implicate individuals without substantiated proof is not only reckless but also undermines the integrity of public discourse. Allegations of this nature demand credible evidence capable of standing the test of legal scrutiny—not speculation, hearsay, or viral audio clips circulating on social media.

Yes, electoral integrity must always be safeguarded. Allegations—especially serious ones—should be thoroughly investigated. But they must be pursued through lawful channels, not through media sensationalism that risks inflaming tensions and eroding public trust in national institutions.

Education should cultivate discipline, responsibility, and respect for truth. Unfortunately, what Mr. Manneh has demonstrated is the opposite—an abandonment of intellectual rigor in favor of unsubstantiated claims.

Politics is not a refuge for excuses. It is a contest of ideas, credibility, and organization. The Gambian people are discerning, and they expect leadership—not noise.

If there is evidence, present it before the appropriate legal bodies. If not, then it is time to put an end to the cycle of baseless allegations and allow the democratic process to proceed with the seriousness it deserves.

GID Clarifies Reports on “Fraudulent Gambian Passports” Seized in Canada

By Jarranews Staff Reporter

The Gambia Immigration Department (GID) has issued a clarification following reports by the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) regarding the interception of fraudulent passports allegedly linked to The Gambia.

In a press release dated April 16, 2026, the GID stated that it had taken note of a CBSA announcement on April 14, 2026, which reported the seizure of five passports described as “fraudulent” and bearing identical photographs but different identities—an indicator commonly associated with counterfeit documents.

The Department emphasized that references to “fraudulent passports from The Gambia” relate only to the apparent origin or resemblance of the documents and do not suggest that they were officially issued by Gambian authorities. According to the GID, it remains the sole institution legally mandated to issue Gambian passports, all of which are produced through secure and verifiable systems.

The GID categorically stated that the passports in question were not issued by the Department and are therefore considered counterfeit reproductions.

Authorities further disclosed that the Department’s Intelligence and Investigation Unit has initiated direct engagement with the CBSA to gather more details surrounding the seizure and to support ongoing international efforts to combat document fraud.

Reaffirming its commitment to international standards, the GID noted that its passport issuance system aligns with best practices set by the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), ensuring the integrity and security of Gambian travel documents.

The Department also assured both the public and international partners of its firm stance against document fraud, highlighting continued collaboration with global law enforcement agencies to tackle transnational crime and irregular migration.

The statement was signed by Inspector Siman Lowe, Public Relations Officer of the Gambia Immigration Department.

WhatsonGambia’s Reporting on Alleged Passport Fraud Is Misleading And Unprofessional

By JarranewsTV Staff Reporter

Concerns are mounting over the professional standards of the media platform WhatsonGambia following its recent publication of a misleading report regarding an alleged passport fraud case involving a Nigerian national in Canada.

The outlet reported that a woman, identified as Nnenna Oketa, had been arrested in possession of multiple Gambian passports, all bearing the same photograph but different names. However, critics argue that the report lacked critical context and failed to present the full facts surrounding the incident.

According to verified information from the Canada Border Services Agency, the suspect was found with seven fraudulent travel documents concealed in a shipment. These included five Gambian passports and two South African passports. Importantly, all the documents were counterfeit, a key detail that WhatsonGambia reportedly omitted in its coverage.

Authorities confirmed that the passports carried identical photographs but different identities, pointing to a coordinated fraud scheme rather than any legitimate issuance of official documents. The case has since been referred to the Royal Canadian Mounted Police for further investigation, and the suspect faces charges related to possession of forged passports under Canadian law.

The issue of foreign nationals attempting or requiring national documents fraudulently is very common.  Recently over 400 Nigerian nationals were arrested in Ghana for illegal possession of Ghanaian passport.

Media observers have criticized WhatsonGambia for what they describe as selective reporting, accusing the platform of publishing sensational claims without adequate verification or context. Such omissions, they warn, risk misleading the public and unfairly damaging the reputation of national institutions.

The incident has reignited calls for greater adherence to journalistic ethics, particularly in an era where digital platforms play an increasingly influential role in shaping public opinion. Observers stress that responsible journalism requires accuracy, balance, and full disclosure of facts—standards that must be upheld regardless of editorial stance.

As the investigation continues, Jarranews is urging media outlets to exercise caution and professionalism, emphasizing that credibility remains the cornerstone of public trust.

GRTS Journalist Refutes SIS Questioning Claims, Calls Reports Misleading

By JarranewsTV Staff Reporter

A journalist with the Gambia Radio and Television Services (GRTS), attached to the Office of the Vice President, has strongly refuted reports circulating online alleging that he was arrested and questioned by national security authorities.

Omar P. Jallow dismissed the claims as “false, unfounded, and misleading,” insisting that he has not been invited or interrogated by the State Intelligence Services (SIS), nor has his service passport been confiscated.

“I have not been invited or questioned by SIS in relation to these allegations. Additionally, my service passport has not been seized, nor was I denied any official travel,” Jallow stated in a message posted on his Facebook page.

The reports, widely shared by some online activists and commentators, also attempted to link Jallow to a purported controversy surrounding a recent community fundraising event in Sare Gainako. According to those claims, the situation was allegedly tied to dissatisfaction from senior political figure Seedy Njie over the invitation of Kanifing Municipal Council Mayor Talib Bensouda.

However, Jallow rejected the assertions, describing them as speculative and without basis. He clarified that he did not personally invite Mayor Bensouda, emphasizing that the invitation was extended collectively by members of the community.

“The event was a community-driven initiative, reflecting the collective decision and participation of the village,” he explained, urging the public to disregard what he termed misinformation.

The development comes amid growing concerns over the spread of unverified information in the country’s media space. Observers note that the incident underscores the increasing need for responsible journalism, professional ethics, and regulatory frameworks to safeguard the credibility of the media landscape in The Gambia.

On David Kujabi’s Commentary: Why Dr.Ismaila Ceesay is not Yahya Jammeh

 

By Alagi Yorro Jallow

Selective outrage and inherited grievances undermine public debate in The Gambia, resulting in tribalized criticism and silencing dissent until it becomes convenient. We must commit to principled and honest intellectual discourse.

Selective outrage and borrowed enemies undermine honest debate. Some who were silent under dictatorship now speak out in democracy. Criticism should be principled, not tribal or inherited. A democracy cannot survive on selective courage. Too often in The Gambia, attacks are based on popularity rather than principle. People chase applause by holding grudges rather than developing independent convictions. This is conformity disguised as courage. I've challenged Dr. Ismaila Ceesay’s policies and decisions. That is legitimate, democratic, and necessary. But my criticism is never personal or inherited; it is always about ideas, not vendettas or tribe.

Our national discourse is suffering from a crisis of selective outrage, borrowed enmity, and intellectual dishonesty. Too many people attack individuals not because of principle, but because it is fashionable. Too many inherit other people’s enemies rather than form their own convictions. Too many speak loudly only when the target is safe, and remain silent when courage is costly. This is not the civic culture The Gambia needs. This is not the intellectual maturity our democracy requires.

There is a truth that must be said with dignity: Anyone who refused to criticize Yahya Jammeh’s 22‑year dictatorship has no moral authority to lecture anyone today. For two decades, Gambians were detained, exiled, tortured, disappeared, and silenced. Journalists were hunted. Students were shot. Families were torn apart. Entire communities lived in fear. During those years, many of the loudest voices today were silent. Not a word. Not a whisper. Not a sentence of solidarity. Some refused to criticize Jammeh because he was from their tribe. Some refused because silence was safer. Some refused because neutrality was more comfortable than truth. Yet today, these same voices find extraordinary energy to condemn a civilian minister in a democratic government. This is not courage. It is convenient. It is selective outrage masquerading as principle.

Fatoumatta: I have challenged Dr. Ismaila Ceesay in government on his arguments, decisions, and positions. That is necessary and democratic. But Dr. Ceesay is not Yahya Jammeh; he did not run a dictatorship, torture Gambians, or preside over a reign of terror. To equate his role in government with the brutality of a 22‑year autocracy is not analysis. It is an exaggeration. It is historical amnesia. It is the kind of intellectual dishonesty that weakens public debate.

What Dr. Ceesay taught as a political science lecturer is not identical to the constraints of governing. Theory and governance are not the same terrain. One is a classroom; the other is a battlefield of competing interests, institutional limitations, and political realities. Critique him, yes. Hold him accountable, yes. But do so with fairness, context, and intellectual honesty.

David Kujabi’s recent commentary on Dr. Ceesay is notable for its literary style, which is eloquent, poetic, and sharply written. But eloquence is not evidence. Poetry is not proof. And metaphor is not analysis. However, rhetorical skill is not a substitute for a substantiated argument. It is relevant to observe, factually and dispassionately, that Mr. Kujabi worked in the Gambia Police Force during a period when state institutions, including the police, were implicated in repression. This is included solely as historical background.

During those years, many Gambians suffered under state power. Yet we did not hear Mr. Kujabi’s voice in the national struggle against dictatorship. Silence is a choice, and he had the right to make that choice. But silence during tyranny and loudness during democracy is a contradiction worth examining, especially when that loudness is directed at individuals who never presided over repression.

To criticize Dr. Ceesay today while never having criticized Jammeh yesterday is not a matter of principle; it is a matter of selective courage. And selective courage is the enemy of intellectual honesty.

 One of the most corrosive habits in our political culture is the tendency to inherit other people’s enemies. Some individuals attack public figures not because they disagree with their ideas, but because they have adopted someone else’s grudges. Others criticize leaders from different communities while protecting those from their own. This is not justice. This is not activism. This is tribalized criticism, and it is dangerous. A democracy cannot grow on borrowed hostility. A nation cannot mature on inherited grudges. A public debate cannot thrive on selective outrage. The Gambia deserves a higher standard of debate. We must cultivate a political culture where criticism is principled, not tribal; disagreement is intellectual, not personal; accountability is consistent, not selective; and truth is universal, not seasonal.

I will continue to critique policies, ideas, and governance failures. I will continue to defend truth, justice, and accountability. But I will not participate in the politics of personal destruction. The Gambia deserves better. Our democracy deserves better. Our public discourse deserves better.

Dr. Ismaila Ceesay Is More Trustworthy Than David Kujabi A Man Who Helped Dictatorship

By Yaya Dampha, NPP Diaspora Coordinator

The recent commentary by David Kujabi, attempting to question the integrity of Dr. Ismaila Ceesay, is not only unconvincing—it is profoundly undermined by his own record in office.

I write not from speculation, but from lived experience.

As a local contact for Amnesty International, I can vividly recall numerous instances in which we reached out to David Kujabi in his capacity as Police PRO, seeking urgent clarification on the whereabouts and conditions of individuals held in police custody. These were not casual inquiries—they were matters of human rights, often involving detainees held without due process under the regime of Yahya Jammeh.

Yet, time and again, those calls went unanswered.

On several occasions, they were outright rejected.

This was not mere administrative delay—it was a pattern of deliberate silence at moments when transparency and accountability were most needed.

Even more troubling are the memories surrounding the case of Alagie Abdoulie Ceesay, a respected radio journalist who, along with his brother, was detained and reportedly held incommunicado under conditions that raised serious fears of torture. During this period, families, journalists, and human rights actors sought answers. The public needed reassurance. The international community demanded clarity.

But again, silence prevailed.

Ceesay was eventually released, but tragically passed away only months later—an outcome that continues to cast a long shadow over that episode and raises serious moral questions about the treatment he endured in custody.

These are not distant or abstract issues. They are part of a documented period in our national history when fear overshadowed freedom, and when those entrusted with public communication often chose silence over truth.

It is against this backdrop that Kujabi’s current attempt to lecture the nation on “principle” and “political truth” must be assessed.

Today, he speaks loudly, casting doubt on the credibility of a sitting minister who operates in an environment where criticism is not suppressed but openly expressed. Yet, when he himself occupied a position of authority—one that demanded courage, clarity, and accountability—his voice was conspicuously absent.

This is the contradiction that cannot be ignored.

Dr. Ismaila Ceesay represents a different trajectory—one of engagement, reform, and institutional openness. His transition from critic to policymaker reflects growth and responsibility, not betrayal. In contrast, Kujabi’s trajectory reflects a troubling shift from silence in times of repression to selective outrage in times of freedom.

The Gambian people deserve honest discourse, grounded in facts and consistent principles—not revisionist narratives shaped by convenience.

Before David Kujabi positions himself as a moral authority, he must first reckon with a simple and unavoidable question:

Where was his voice when citizens were detained, when journalists were silenced, and when families were desperately seeking answers?

Until that question is answered, his criticisms will continue to ring hollow—drowned out by the echoes of a silence that history will not forget.

A Necessary Reality Check: Why the IFJ Must Recalibrate Its View of The Gambia

The reflections of Alagi Yorro Jallow arrive at a critical moment—one that demands intellectual honesty, institutional humility, and, above all, a recalibration of perspective by international partners such as the International Federation of Journalists.

There is no denying the historical role the IFJ and similar bodies played during the dark years of repression under Yahya Jammeh. Their vigilance, advocacy, and solidarity were not only necessary—they were lifesaving. But history, however painful, must not become a permanent lens through which present realities are distorted.

The Gambia of 2026 is not a continuation of 2004. It is a transformed, evolving democracy grappling not with state-sponsored repression of the press, but with a far more complex and modern dilemma: the erosion of professional journalism standards in the digital age.

To ignore this shift is not merely an oversight—it is a disservice.

The IFJ’s recent posture, as rightly highlighted by Jallow, appears to conflate two fundamentally different concepts: state control and professional regulation. In doing so, it risks reducing a nuanced national conversation into a simplistic narrative of repression. This is not only inaccurate, but it undermines the very professionalism and fair play the IFJ claims to uphold.

Journalism, by its very nature, is not an unregulated free-for-all. Across credible democracies, it is guided by ethical codes, professional standards, and systems of accreditation—not imposed by governments, but shaped and enforced by the profession itself. That is the benchmark of serious journalism.

Yet in The Gambia today, the landscape tells a different story. The democratization of media—while empowering—has also opened the floodgates to a troubling phenomenon: the collapse of distinction between trained journalists and unverified voices. Activists, influencers, and opportunists now operate under the banner of journalism, often without adherence to ethics, accountability, or factual rigor.

This is the decadence that must be confronted.

Freedom of expression must never be mistaken for freedom from responsibility. A society where “everyone with internet access” can publish, broadcast, and declare “breaking news” without verification is not the pinnacle of democracy—it is a breeding ground for misinformation, reputational harm, and public distrust.

If the IFJ is truly committed to the principles of professionalism, ethical journalism, and fairness, then it must engage with this reality. It must acknowledge that the greatest threat to Gambian journalism today is not state suppression, but the internal dilution of standards.

And this is where the IFJ must do better.

Before issuing sweeping condemnations, international bodies have a duty to be adequately informed, contextually grounded, and intellectually rigorous. Reaction without reflection risks not only misrepresentation but also the alienation of the very institutions they seek to support.

The Gambia does not need outdated advocacy rooted in a past it has worked hard to overcome. It needs informed partnership—one that recognizes progress while constructively engaging with present challenges.

Jallow’s argument is not a rejection of international solidarity. It is a call for its evolution.

A credible IFJ response would not reflexively oppose regulation, but would instead champion a balanced framework: defending press freedom while supporting profession-led accreditation, ethical enforcement, and institutional strengthening. That is the model that sustains journalism in mature democracies—and it is the model The Gambia deserves to pursue.

The message is clear: solidarity must not be static. It must grow, adapt, and respond to reality.

The Gambia has moved forward. Its partners must do the same.

Anything less is not support—it is stagnation disguised as advocacy.